Bryant Jr. v. Equifax Information Services LLC
| George Bryant Jr. |
| Equifax Information Services LLC |
| 1:2023cv00611 |
| May 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by George Bryant Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Robertson, Allen) |
Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of the lack of opposition, IT IS ORDERED that Shakeria Northcross is withdrawn as counsel in this case. The parties are reminded to include a certificate of conference so that the Court may efficiently rule on this type of motion. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sh)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by George Bryant Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Northcross, Shakeria) |
|
Text Order GRANTING Motion to Stay Case entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that this case is STAYED until August 28, 2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file either dismissal papers or an agreed motion to stay on or before August 28, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sh)
|
| MOTION to Stay contained in Notice of Settlement Doc. #6. (jv2) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by George Bryant Jr. (Robertson, Allen) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Equifax Information Services LLC.(Seger, Forrest) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Equifax Information Services LLC answer due 6/23/2023. (jv2) Modified on 6/9/2023 to reflect correct answer due date (jv2). |
|
Text Order GRANTING #3 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond on or before June 23, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sh)
|
| Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Equifax Information Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services LLC. (Seger, Forrest) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Seger, Forrest) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER that the removing party, if it has not already done so, shall within ten (10) days from the date of this order supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Equifax Information Services LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number ATXWDC-17499978), filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement to Cover Sheet)(Seger, Forrest) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cc3) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell (cc3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
