Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Olscrhti Bev Dos, LLC et al
| Innovative Sports Management, Inc. as Broadcast Licensee of the September 5, 2021 Peru v. Venezuela Soccer Match doing business as Integrated Sports Media |
| Olscrhti Bev Dos, LLC doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin, Richard S Hicks doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin, Crazy Eyes Holdings, LLC doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin, Reach Restaurant Group, LLC doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin, Todd Istre doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin and Richard S. Hicks doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin |
| 1:2023cv00784 |
| July 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Docket - Austin |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Order by Innovative Sports Management, Inc. (Diaz, David) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Crazy Eyes Holdings, LLC, Richard S. Hicks, Todd Istre, Olscrhti Bev Dos, LLC, Reach Restaurant Group, LLC. (dm) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Innovative Sports Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons request for Richard S. Hicks, #2 Summons request for Crazy Eyes Holdings, LLC, #3 Summons request for Reach Restaurant Group, LLC, #4 Summons request for Todd Istre)(Diaz, David) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell. (cr5) |
| Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Innovative Sports Management, Inc.. (Diaz, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17653326). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Innovative Sports Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Diaz, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Olscrhti Bev Dos, LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. as Broadcast Licensee of the September 5, 2021 Peru v. Venezuela Soccer Match doing business as Integrated Sports Media | |
| Represented By: | David M. Diaz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Olscrhti Bev Dos, LLC doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Richard S Hicks doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Crazy Eyes Holdings, LLC doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reach Restaurant Group, LLC doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Todd Istre doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Richard S. Hicks doing business as Ojos Locos Sports Cantina doing business as Ojos Locos Austin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
