Tecovas, Inc. v. Freebird Stores, Inc.
Tecovas, Inc. doing business as Tecovas Boots, Inc. |
Freebird Stores, Inc., Freebird Stores, Inc. a Colorado Corporation doing business as Freebird Stores and Does 1-10 |
1:2023cv00801 |
July 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Robert Pitman |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Freebird Stores, Inc. answer due 9/19/2023. (jv2) |
Text Order GRANTING #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before September 19, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmlc) |
Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Tecovas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Fountain, Jamie) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #8 Stipulation; Freebird Stores, Inc. answer due 9/5/2023. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jv2) |
Notice of Correction: re #8 Stipulation by Joint Parties Extending Time for Defendant to file Answer to Complaint. Extending the deadline to file an answer or otherwise respond to a complaint requires leave of the Court and should be filed as a Motion along with a Proposed Order rather than filed as a Stipulation. The clerk has modified the entry to add a motion event. Please take note for future filing purposes. (jv2) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION by Joint Parties Extending Time for Defendant to file Answer to Complaint by Tecovas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Blakely, Brent) Modified on 8/11/2023 (jv2). |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tecovas, Inc.. Freebird Stores, Inc. served on 7/25/2023, answer due 8/15/2023. (Fountain, Jamie) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jamie Fountain for Tecovas, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jv2) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Brent Herbert Blakely for appearance of Jamie Fountain ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number BTXWDC-17711237) by on behalf of Tecovas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Blakely, Brent) |
Filing 4 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office along with a copy of the complaint. (so) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Freebird Stores, Inc.. (so) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (so) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane (so) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Tecovas, Inc.. (so) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Tecovas, Inc.. (Blakely, Brent) (Main Document 2 replaced on 7/17/2023 to flatten image) (so). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17660328), filed by Tecovas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Blakely, Brent) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/17/2023 to flatten) (so). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.