Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC v. Enovis Corporation
Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC |
Enovis Corporation |
1:2023cv00810 |
July 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Docket - Austin |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Enovis Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Amstutz, Paige) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint for Patent Infringement, (Dkt. 1), on or before September 8, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (HSlc) |
Reset Deadline: Enovis Corporation answer due 9/8/2023. (cc3) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Enovis Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Amstutz, Paige) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC. Enovis Corporation served on 7/19/2023, answer due 8/9/2023. (Garteiser, Randall) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Enovis Corporation. (so) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC. (Vazquez, Rene) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Vazquez, Rene) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CTXWDC-17666007), filed by Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - '160 Patent, #2 Exhibit B - Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vazquez, Rene) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC. (so) |
Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (so) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane (so) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC v. Enovis Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC | |
Represented By: | M. Scott Fuller |
Represented By: | Randall T. Garteiser |
Represented By: | Rene A. Vazquez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Enovis Corporation | |
Represented By: | Paige Arnette Amstutz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.