Welsh v. McLane et al
| Marsha McLane and Chris Greenwalt |
| Lonnie Kade Welsh |
| 1:2023cv00890 |
| July 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Dustin M Howell |
| Robert Pitman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING #6 Motion for Leave to File to Amend Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3)
|
| Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File to Amend Complaint by Lonnie Kade Welsh. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint, #2 Attachment A, #3 Attachment B)(pg) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER, It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious and this case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter as to Lonnie Kade Welsh (cc3) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER (dated 2/21/2020) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin Howell. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Lonnie Kade Welsh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cc3) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cc3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
