Hambright v. EXACTECH, INC. et al
| Susan Hambright |
| EXACTECH, INC., EXACTECH U.S., INC., EXACTECH, INC. d/b/a EXACTECH and EXACTECH U.S., INC. d/b/a EXACTECH |
| 1:2023cv00906 |
| August 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred to Eastern District of New York. (dm) |
| Case transferred from TXWD has been received and opened in Eastern District of New York as case 1:23-cv-06624. (dm) |
| Filing 2 Conditional Transfer Order entered by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Signed by Tiffaney D. Pete, Clerk of the Panel. (dm) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (dm) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17731343). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Susan Hambright. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Breen, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
