FILING ERROR
| Ana Carolina Serrano |
| Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Rohit Chopra |
| 1:2023cv00979 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 5 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Memorandum in Support of #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Request for Temporary Injunction by Ana Carolina Serrano. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Sergi, David) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Request for Temporary Injunction by Ana Carolina Serrano. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sergi, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Request for Temporary Restraining Order and Request for Temporary Injunction ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BTXWDC-17790527). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Ana Carolina Serrano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(Sergi, David) |
| ***CIVIL CASE OPENING ERROR. This case was opened by David Sergi in the wrong divisional office. The case style reflects this case was intended for filing in the Midland/Odessa division. This case has been copied to 7:23cv132 and this case is closed as a case filing error. (kc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
