Dalton v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Gregory James Dalton
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 1:2023cv01105
Filed: September 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Docket - Austin
Referring Judge: Susan Hightower
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2023 Reset Deadlines: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID answer due 11/16/2023. (dm)
October 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Respondent shall file an answer on or before November 16, 2023. Entered by Judge Robert Pitman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj)
October 17, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with Brief in Support by Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Susan Hightower. (Morris, Jennifer)
October 17, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jennifer Wren Morris on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID. Attorney Jennifer Wren Morris added to party Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID(pty:res) (Morris, Jennifer)
September 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Directing Respondent to Answer Petition #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gregory James Dalton. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm)
September 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER (dated 05/11/2023) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cr5)
September 14, 2023 Filing 3 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Gregory James Dalton. (cr5)
September 14, 2023 Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5)
September 14, 2023 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower. (cr5)
September 14, 2023 Filing 2 Memorandum in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Gregory James Dalton. (Lieberman, Steven)
September 14, 2023 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (28 U.S.C. 2254) ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXWDC-17882358), filed by Gregory James Dalton.(Lieberman, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dalton v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory James Dalton
Represented By: Steven J. Lieberman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Represented By: Jennifer Wren Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?