Steve Sattler v. Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation et al
Steve Sattler, as Trustee of the Sattler Family Trust and Steve Sattler |
Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation and Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc. |
1:2023cv01492 |
December 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Docket - Austin |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc., re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc. (Chavez, Hector) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Change of Address by Hector Raul Chavez, III (Chavez, Hector) |
Filing 15 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Steve Sattler, re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit1, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Denying Motion to Dismiss)(Cruzcosa, Mark) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark Sean Cruzcosa on behalf of Steve Sattler. Attorney Mark Sean Cruzcosa added to party Steve Sattler(pty:pla) (Cruzcosa, Mark) |
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jeremy T. Borden for Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation and for Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jv2) |
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Evan A. Fetters for Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation and for Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jv2) |
Text Order GRANTING #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss on or before January 24, 2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmlc) |
Filing 11 Proposed Order to #10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Steve Sattler. (Johnson, Jeffery) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Steve Sattler. (Johnson, Jeffery) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffery Robert Johnson for Katherine M. Wyatt on behalf of Steve Sattler (Johnson, Jeffery) Modified on 12/28/2023 (jv2). |
Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hector Raul Chavez, III (Jeremy T. Borden) ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-18241416) by on behalf of Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation, Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chavez, Hector) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hector Raul Chavez, III (Evan A. Fetters) ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-18241362) by on behalf of Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation, Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chavez, Hector) |
Filing 6 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation, Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services, Inc., Other Affiliate Marcus & Millichap, Inc. for Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation, Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc.. (Chavez, Hector) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chavez, Hector) |
Filing 4 ORDER to supplement the record. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (so) |
Filing 3 Pro Hac Vice Letter re: non-admittance into WDTX for Jeremy T. Borden and Evan A. Fetters. (so) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, Supplement to JS 44 Civil Cover Sheet by Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation, Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc.. (Chavez, Hector) |
Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (so) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower (so) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ATXWDC-18183508), filed by Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Nevada, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chavez, Hector) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.