Noel et al v. Workrise Technologies Inc. et al
| Eva Noel, Stephanie Noel, Dany LaFortune, Gaby Martin, Elijha Brazil and Francois Rodrigue |
| Workrise Technologies Inc. and HCS Renewable Energy LLC |
| 1:2024cv00110 |
| January 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 APPENDIX to #9 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Elijha Brazil, Dany LaFortune, Gaby Martin, Eva Noel, Stephanie Noel, Francois Rodrigue. (Sanford, Brian) |
| Filing 9 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Elijha Brazil, Dany LaFortune, Gaby Martin, Eva Noel, Stephanie Noel, Francois Rodrigue, re #7 Opposed MOTION for More Definite Statement To Seal Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant HCS Renewable Energy LLC, Defendant Workrise Technologies Inc. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Table of Contents, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4)(Sanford, Brian) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by HCS Renewable Energy LLC, Workrise Technologies Inc..(Ackels, Alana) |
| Filing 7 Opposed MOTION for More Definite Statement To Seal Plaintiffs' Complaint by HCS Renewable Energy LLC, Workrise Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ackels, Alana) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Samuel O. Maduegbuna on behalf of Elijha Brazil, Dany LaFortune, Gaby Martin, Eva Noel, Stephanie Noel, Francois Rodrigue. Attorney Samuel O. Maduegbuna added to party Elijha Brazil(pty:pla), Attorney Samuel O. Maduegbuna added to party Gaby Martin(pty:pla), Attorney Samuel O. Maduegbuna added to party Francois Rodrigue(pty:pla) (Maduegbuna, Samuel) |
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to SAMUEL O. MADUEGBUNA. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to HCS Renewable Energy LLC, Workrise Technologies Inc.. (kp) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Samuel O. Maduegbuna ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-18367674) by on behalf of Elijha Brazil, Dany LaFortune, Gaby Martin, Eva Noel, Stephanie Noel, Francois Rodrigue. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Maduegbuna, Samuel) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin Howell. (kp) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Elijha Brazil, Dany LaFortune, Gaby Martin, Eva Noel, Stephanie Noel, Francois Rodrigue. (kp) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Elijha Brazil, Dany LaFortune, Gaby Martin, Eva Noel, Stephanie Noel, Francois Rodrigue. Workrise and HCS (Sanford, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18363875), filed by Francois Rodrigue, Dany LaFortune, Stephanie Noel, Gaby Martin, Eva Noel, Elijha Brazil. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, Brian) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/31/2024 to flatten document) (kp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
