Auto Group Premier, Inc. v. Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company
| Auto Group Premier, Inc. doing business as Roger Beasley Mazda of Georgetown |
| Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company |
| 1:2024cv00145 |
| February 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Proposed Scheduling Order (AGREED) by Auto Group Premier, Inc.. (Burgess, Karen) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #14 Amended Complaint by Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company.(Badger, Steven) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company amending, filed by Auto Group Premier, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Burgess, Karen) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ashley Brenna Pedigo on behalf of Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company. Attorney Ashley Brenna Pedigo added to party Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Pedigo, Ashley) |
Text Order GRANTING #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before March 15, 2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tclc)
|
| Reset Deadlines: Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company answer due 3/15/2024. (dm) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Badger, Steven) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Auto Group Premier, Inc.. Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company served on 2/13/2024, answer due 3/5/2024. (Burgess, Karen) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company. (kp) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Auto Group Premier, Inc.. (CORRECTED) (Burgess, Karen) |
| Filing 8 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Auto Group Premier, Inc.. (Burgess, Karen) |
| Filing 7 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #5 Request for Issuance of Summons, this summons cannot be issued as requested because you did not complete the section instructing the defendant of the name and address to serve the answer or motion. Please complete this section and resubmit. (kp) |
| Filing 6 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re #1 Complaint, the Complaint you filed is deficient because you did not attach a JS44. This form can be located on our website. Please prepare and electronically submit the JS44 using the event located at Civil Events -Other Filings - Other Documents - JS44. This form is required for civil cases filed in the Western District of Texas. (kp) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Auto Group Premier, Inc. d/b/a Roger Beasley Mazda of Georgetown. (Burgess, Karen) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Auto Group Premier, Inc. d/b/a Roger Beasley Mazda of Georgetown. (Burgess, Karen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Patricia Dolan-Galaviz on behalf of Auto Group Premier, Inc. d/b/a Roger Beasley Mazda of Georgetown. Attorney Patricia Dolan-Galaviz added to party Auto Group Premier, Inc. d/b/a Roger Beasley Mazda of Georgetown(pty:pla) (Dolan-Galaviz, Patricia) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stacy Rogers Sharp on behalf of Auto Group Premier, Inc. d/b/a Roger Beasley Mazda of Georgetown. Attorney Stacy Rogers Sharp added to party Auto Group Premier, Inc. d/b/a Roger Beasley Mazda of Georgetown(pty:pla) (Sharp, Stacy) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin Howell. (kp) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Auto Group Premier, Inc.. (kp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18405235). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Auto Group Premier, Inc. d/b/a Roger Beasley Mazda of Georgetown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Burgess, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Auto Group Premier, Inc. v. Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Auto Group Premier, Inc. doing business as Roger Beasley Mazda of Georgetown | |
| Represented By: | Karen C. Burgess |
| Represented By: | Patricia Dolan-Galaviz |
| Represented By: | Stacy Rogers Sharp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Steven J. Badger |
| Represented By: | Ashley Brenna Pedigo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
