Ellis v. WellsFargo Bank et al
Willie H. Ellis |
WellsFargo Bank, Yale University, CaixaBank, BBVA Compass Bank, Scottish Rite of Freemasonary Supreme Counsel Southern Jurisdiction, Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite Supreme Council of the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction, Bantmax Securities, ConocoPhillips and John and Jane Does |
1:2024cv00177 |
February 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Docket - Austin |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite Supreme Council of the Northern Masonic Jurisdiction, BBVA Compass Bank, Bantmax Securities, CaixaBank, ConocoPhillips, Scottish Rite of Freemasonary Supreme Counsel Southern Jurisdiction, WellsFargo Bank, Yale University. (cr5) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 1520), filed by Willie H. Ellis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(cr5) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Willie H. Ellis. (cr5) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Lane. (cr5) |
Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.