Thomas v. Lanier et al
Plaintiff: Ethan Dorron Thomas
Defendant: Curtis Dale Lanier and National Express Carriers Inc.
Case Number: 1:2024cv00200
Filed: February 28, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2024 Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order by Curtis Dale Lanier, National Express Carriers Inc.. (Aspy, Paul)
April 26, 2024 Filing 7 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan by Curtis Dale Lanier, National Express Carriers Inc.. (Aspy, Paul)
February 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that the removing party, if it has not already done so, shall within ten (10) days from the date of this order supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (kp)
February 28, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE To Court That All Documents Were Served on All Parties by Curtis Dale Lanier, National Express Carriers, Inc. (Aspy, Paul)
February 28, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Index of Matters Being Filed by Curtis Dale Lanier, National Express Carriers, Inc. (Aspy, Paul)
February 28, 2024 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Parties by Curtis Dale Lanier, National Express Carriers, Inc.. (Aspy, Paul)
February 28, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing List of All Counsel of Record by Curtis Dale Lanier, National Express Carriers, Inc. (Aspy, Paul)
February 28, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by National Express Carriers, Inc., Curtis Dale Lanier (Filing fee $405 receipt number ATXWDC-18468878), filed by National Express Carriers, Inc., Curtis Dale Lanier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement)(Aspy, Paul) (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/28/2024 to flatten document) (kp).
February 28, 2024 Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp)
February 28, 2024 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. (kp)
February 28, 2024 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Curtis Dale Lanier, National Express Carriers Inc., Ethan Dorron Thomas. (kp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Lanier et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ethan Dorron Thomas
Represented By: Joseph J. Barrientos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Curtis Dale Lanier
Represented By: Madison Hannah-Naylor Preston
Represented By: Paul Clark Aspy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Express Carriers Inc.
Represented By: Paul Clark Aspy
Represented By: Madison Hannah-Naylor Preston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?