Leyva v. Amazon Logistics, Inc. et al
| Jonathan Leyva |
| Amazon Logistics, Inc., Carranza Trucking, LLC. and Alberto Medina Sarria |
| 1:2024cv00209 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Docket - Austin |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand . Attorney John W. Bridger added to party Amazon Logistics, Inc.(pty:dft) by Amazon Logistics, Inc..(Bridger, John) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Amazon Logistics, Inc., Alberto Medina Sarria, Carranza Trucking, LLC.. (kp) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jonathan Leyva. (kp) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. (kp) |
| Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp) |
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Jonathan Leyva. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Gowan, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18477707), filed by Jonathan Leyva. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gowan, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
