Edge Networking Systems, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
| Edge Networking Systems, LLC |
| Microsoft Corporation |
| 1:2024cv00215 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Docket - Austin |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 100 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reset Deadlines: Microsoft Corporation answer due 5/9/2024. (dm) |
Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before May 9, 2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tclc)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE/MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Edge Networking Systems, LLC re #4 Amended Complaint (Hecht, David) Modified on 3/27/2024 to create motion and correct event type (dm). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edge Networking Systems, LLC. Microsoft Corporation served on 3/5/2024, answer due 3/26/2024. (Hecht, David) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Microsoft Corporation. (kp) |
| Filing 4 CORRECTED COMPLAINT filed per Clerk's Instructions, corrected to correct case heading against Microsoft Corporation amending #1 Complaint,., filed by Edge Networking Systems, LLC.(Hecht, David) Modified on 3/4/2024 (dm). |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Edge Networking Systems, LLC. (kp) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. (kp) |
| Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Edge Networking Systems, LLC. (Hecht, David) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Hecht, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18479169), filed by Edge Networking Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - U.S. Patent No. 10,686,871, #2 Exhibit 2 - U.S. Patent No. 10,893,095, #3 Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 11,695,823, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hecht, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Edge Networking Systems, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Edge Networking Systems, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David L. Hecht |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Microsoft Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
