Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Plaintiff: Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2024cv00223
Filed: March 4, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2024 Filing 9 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (pg)
April 11, 2024 Filing 8 ORDER, IT IS ORDERED that the case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg)
April 10, 2024 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Garteiser, Randall)
March 14, 2024 Text Order GRANTING #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before May 13, 2024. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sslc)
March 14, 2024 Reset Deadlines: Smith & Nephew, Inc. answer due 5/13/2024. (klw)
March 13, 2024 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC. (Garteiser, Randall)
March 13, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC. Smith & Nephew, Inc. served on 3/8/2024, answer due 3/29/2024. (Garteiser, Randall)
March 4, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (kp)
March 4, 2024 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC. (Garteiser, Randall)
March 4, 2024 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 forwarded to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Vazquez, Rene)
March 4, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18484622), filed by Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Patent, #2 Exhibit B - Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vazquez, Rene)
March 4, 2024 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin Howell. (kp)
March 4, 2024 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC. (kp)
March 4, 2024 Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Distribution Intelligence Systems, LLC
Represented By: Christopher A. Honea
Represented By: Rene A. Vazquez
Represented By: M. Scott Fuller
Represented By: Randall T. Garteiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?