Adkins v. San Marcos Police Department
Marcus Adkins |
San Marcos Police Department |
1:2024cv00251 |
February 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Docket - Austin |
Mark Lane |
Robert Pitman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg) |
Filing 10 ORDER, It is therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. Any and all pending motions are DISMISSED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (pg) |
Case reassigned to Judge Robert Pitman. Judge Docket II - Austin no longer assigned to the case. (pg) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Marcus Adkins. Motions referred to Judge Mark Lane. (cc3) |
Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and ORDERING Plaintiff on or before April 5, 2024, shall show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3) |
Text Order DISMISSING #3 Motion to Weight Analysis For Possession Less Then A Gram. Plaintiff must direct his motion to his state criminal court. Entered by Judge Robert Pitman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmj) |
Filing 7 Case Transfer Letter to Marcus Adkins. (kp) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER (dated 05/11/2023) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (kp) |
Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp) |
Case transferred in from Waco Division on 02/29/2024 Case Number 6:24-cv-107, filed by Marcus Adkins.(kp) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (kp) |
Filing 5 TRANSFER ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by Marcus Adkins. It is therefore ORDERED that the above-referenced case is TRANSFERRED to the Austin Division of the Western District of Texas. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (zv) |
Filing 4 Case Opening Letter to Marcus Adkins. (zv) |
Filing 3 MOTION To Weight Analysis For Possession Less Then A Gram by Marcus Adkins. (zv) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marcus Adkins. (zv) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Marcus Adkins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS44, #2 Enclosure Letter & Envelope)(zv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Adkins v. San Marcos Police Department | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marcus Adkins | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: San Marcos Police Department | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.