Miller v. U.S. Department of Justice
| Travis Wilson Miller and Travis Miller |
| Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Justice |
| 1:2024cv00252 |
| March 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Docket - Austin |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Joshua Charles Abbuhl added to party U.S. Department of Justice(pty:dft) by U.S. Department of Justice.(Abbuhl, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (kp) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (kp) |
| Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Travis Wilson Miller. (Miller, Travis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18505840), filed by Travis Wilson Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Travis) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/8/2024 to flatten document) (kp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
