Yeti Coolers, LLC v. Xiangsong
Plaintiff: Yeti Coolers, LLC
Defendant: Qi Xiangsong doing business as CARDOQI
Case Number: 1:2024cv00263
Filed: March 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert Pitman
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2024 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Yeti Coolers, LLC. Qi Xiangsong served on 4/26/2024, answer due 5/17/2024. (Denis, Anthony)
April 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING YETIs Renewed Ex Parte #7 Motion For An Order AuthorizingService Of Process On Defendant By Alternate Means. ORDER that YETI is permitted to: (1) serve process on CARDOQI through Amazon.coms Buyer-Seller Messaging Service by YETIs counsel at Banner Witcoff; and (2) serve all other filings on CARDOQI using this method until CARDOQI appears in this action. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (klw)
April 18, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION (Renewed) for an Order Authorizing Service of Process on Defendant by Alternate Means Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3) by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Anthony J. Denis, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Proposed Order)(Denis, Anthony)
April 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING Yeti's #4 Ex Parte Motion for an Order Authorizing Service ofProcess on Defendant by Alternate Means. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (klw)
March 12, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Qi Xiangsong. (cr5)
March 8, 2024 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (cr5)
March 8, 2024 If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Hightower. (cr5)
March 8, 2024 Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5)
March 8, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION for an Order Authorizing Service of Process on Defendant by Alternate Means Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3) by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Valerie Koleno, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Proposed Order)(Denis, Anthony)
March 8, 2024 Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Yeti Coolers, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Yeti Holdings, Inc. for Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Denis, Anthony)
March 8, 2024 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Denis, Anthony)
March 8, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-18510127), filed by Yeti Coolers, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Denis, Anthony)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yeti Coolers, LLC v. Xiangsong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yeti Coolers, LLC
Represented By: Anthony J. Denis
Represented By: Michael L. Krashin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qi Xiangsong doing business as CARDOQI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?