Olympia Moving and Storage v. Kuehne + Nagel, Inc.
| Olympia Moving and Storage |
| Kuehne + Nagel, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00351 |
| April 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Docket - Austin |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER that the removing party, if it has not already done so, shall within ten (10) days from the date of this order supplement the record with state court pleadings. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (kp)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Directing Andrew Robert Spector to File a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice within 14 days. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (kp)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kuehne + Nagel, Inc. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ATXWDC-18603108), filed by Kuehne + Nagel, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement)(Moll, Robert) (Attachment 3 replaced on 4/3/2024 to flatten document) (kp). |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (kp) |
| Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
