Patel v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Chhayaben Ashish Patel |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 1:2024cv00805 |
| July 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Docket - Austin |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (kp) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Steven A. Brown ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-19000527) by on behalf of Chhayaben Ashish Patel. (Brown, Steven) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Chhayaben Ashish Patel. (Brown, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-19000338), filed by Chhayaben Ashish Patel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Steven) |
| Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (kp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
