Leon v. Checkr, Inc.
| Leon Gonzalo and Gonzalo Leon |
| Checkr, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00905 |
| August 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER STAYING CASE, ( Joint Status Report due by 11/26/2024,). Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (dm)
|
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Parties Corporate Disclosure Statement by Checkr, Inc.. (Merar, Michael) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration by Checkr, Inc.. (Merar, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Checkr, Inc.. (kp) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Gonzalo Leon. (kp) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Mark Lane. (kp) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Leon Gonzalo. (Horowitz, Uri) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-19086996), filed by Leon Gonzalo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Horowitz, Uri) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/12/2024 to flatten document) (kp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
