Fluckers v. Fox News Contractors et al
Jermar Fluckers |
Regean E. LNU, Wendi Ann Ortega, Deandre Fluckers, Rudy LNU, Fox News Contractors and BET Contractors |
1:2024cv00998 |
August 27, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Dustin M Howell |
Robert Pitman |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION to Expedite by Jermar Fluckers. Motions referred to Judge Dustin M. Howell. (pg) |
Filing 4 MOTION The Court to provide as Relief of $70,000 to Remitter by Jermar Fluckers. (cr5) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER (dated 002/21/2020) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin M. Howell. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. Referral Magistrate Judge: Dustin M. Howell. (cr5) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jermar Fluckers. (cr5) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP PENDING), filed by Jermar Fluckers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 ADR)(cr5) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jermar Fluckers. (cr5) |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell. (cr5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.