Chavez et al v. General Motors, LLC
| Gerardo Chavez and Benito Chavez |
| General Motors, LLC |
| 1:2024cv01137 |
| September 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Robert Pitman |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statement by General Motors, LLC. (Hall, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 General Motors LLC's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand . Attorney Daniel J. Hall added to party General Motors, LLC(pty:dft) by General Motors, LLC.(Hall, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to General Motors, LLC. (kp) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Benito Chavez, Gerardo Chavez. (kp) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. (kp) |
| Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kp) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Benito Chavez, Gerardo Chavez. (Dalton, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXWDC-19270836), filed by Gerardo Chavez, Benito Chavez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dalton, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
