Dunsmore v. Muth et al
| Richard A. Dunsmore |
| Stephanie Muth, Other Defendants and Cecile Erwin Young |
| 1:2024cv01426 |
| November 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Docket - Austin |
| Dustin M Howell |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Case Opening Letter to Richard A. Dunsmore. (cr5) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER (dated 05/11/2023) REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin M. Howell. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. Referral Magistrate Judge: Dustin M. Howell. (cr5)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard A. Dunsmore. (cr5) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP PENDING), filed by Richard A. Dunsmore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(cr5) |
| Case assigned to Judge Docket II - Austin. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cr5) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Howell. (cr5) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Richard A. Dunsmore. (cr5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
