Compass Bank v. Casa Palmira, LP et al
| Compass Bank |
| Casa Palmira, LP, Carlos E. Veytia and Veronica L. Veytia |
| Casa Palmira, LP, Carlos E. Veytia and Veronica L. Veytia |
| Compass Bank |
| Compass Bank |
| Octavio Maese, OMC Services, LP and Ocho Finance |
| Vey Finance, LLC |
| 3:2011cv00228 |
| December 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| El Paso Office |
| Philip R. Martinez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
205
ORDER GRANTING 191 Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Compass Bank shall have and recover $335,663.30 in attorneys' fees and $45,301.52 from Carlos E. Veytia and Veronica L. Veytia, jointly and severally, plus post -judgment interest at the applicable statutory rates or as allowed under the law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Compass Bank shall have and recover $83,915.83 in attorneys' fees and $11,325.38 in costs from Carlos E. Veytia, plus post-jud gment interest at the applicable statutory rates or as allowed under the law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (mr, )
|
|
Filing
190
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Compass Bank's "Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants Carlos E. Veytia and Veronica L.Veytia" (ECF No. 147) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Compass Bank shall have and recover $9,631,441.76 from Carlos E. Veytia and Veronica L. Veytia, jointly and severally, in addition to whatever interest and fees have accrued in accordance with the terms of the loans and guaranties since 09 /30/11, plus post-judgment interest at the applicable statutory rates or as allowed under the law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Compass Bank shall have and recover $489,797.24 from Carlos E. Veytia, in addition to whatever interest and fees have accrued in accordance witht the terms of the loans and guaranties since 09/30/11, plus post-judgment interest at the applicable statutory rates or as allowed under the law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Compass Bank will FILE a motion for attorney' ;s fees with supporting evidence by no later than 12/14/11 at 5:00 p.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Carlos E. Veytia and Veronica L. Veytia file any appropriate response by no later than 12/21/11 at 5:00 p.m.(MST). FINALLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that both parties may submit a ProposeD Final Judgment, consistent with the Court's ruling, that they would wish the Court to consider for entry by no later than 12/21/11 at 5:00 p.m. (MST).. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (mr, )
|
|
Filing
188
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Compass Bank's "Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims of Carlos E. Veytia and Veronica L. Veytia is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants/Co unter-Plaintiffs Carlos E. Veytia and Veronica L. Veytia's Counterclaims are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Carlos E. Veytia and Veronica L. Veytia's Counterclaims are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Carlos E. Veytia and Veronica L. Veytia's Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (mr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
