Vey Finance, LLC v. Compass Bank
| Compass Bank |
| Vey Finance, LLC |
| U.S. Trustee and U.S. Bankruptcy Clerk, El Paso |
| Vey Finance, LLC |
| Compass Bank |
| 3:2011cv00359 |
| May 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| El Paso Office |
| Philip R. Martinez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
213
ORDER GRANTING 203 Motion for Attorney Fees ordering that Compass Bank shall have and recover $145,503.84 in attorneys' fees and costs, plus post-judgment interest at the applicable statutory rates, Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (mt, )
|
|
Filing
204
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. IT IS ORDERED that all of Defendant Vey Finance, LLC's counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice, except its claims for equitable subordination and determination of the validity, extent, and priority of liens, which are dismissed without prejudice so that the bankruptcy court may consider those issues. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon entry of final judgment, the Clerk of the Court shall disburse the funds placed in the Registry of the Court in co nnection with this case, a total of $251,993.38, to Plaintiff Compass Bank. The Court will enter final judgment in Compass's favor in a separate document, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (mr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
