Vasquez v. Amo Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff: Arnulfo Vazquez
Defendant: Amo Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv00029
Filed: January 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: El Paso Office
Presiding Judge: Kathleen Cardone
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 PLAINTIFF WILL FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 2/22/13 ORDER DENYING 53 Motion to Dismiss ; DENYING 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (dl1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vasquez v. Amo Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arnulfo Vazquez
Represented By: Joseph Isaac
Represented By: Jeffrey B. Pownell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amo Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Steven Joseph Blanco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?