Ramirez et al v. Escajeda et al
Plaintiff: Maria Ramirez and Pedro Ramirez
Defendant: City of El Paso, Texas and Ruben Escajeda, Jr.
Case Number: 3:2017cv00193
Filed: June 22, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: El Paso Office
Presiding Judge: David C Guaderrama
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 196 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs' 171 Motion to Compel Defendant City of El Paso to Supplement Responses to Five Requests for Production. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 195 MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING 185 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Original Complaint Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 177 ORDER GRANTING 165 Motion to Stay Case pending the outcome of Defendant's Escajeda's appeal. The stay will AUTOMATICALLY LIFT on the day the Fifth Circuit releases its opinion. Case is RESET for TRIAL on the first Monday after 45 days after the Fifth Circuit releases its opinion. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 154 MEMORANDUM OPNION AND ORDER DENYING 90 Defendant's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 140 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 79 Motion to exclude; DENYING 80 Motion to exclude; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 85 Motion to exclude; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 101 Motion to exclude Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER DENYING 8 Defendant City of El Paso, Texas's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Original Complaint for Failure to State a Claim; DENYING 14 Defendant Ruben Escajeda, Jr.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Original Complaint. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramirez et al v. Escajeda et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of El Paso, Texas
Represented By: Maria Guadalupe Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruben Escajeda, Jr.
Represented By: Maria Guadalupe Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Ramirez
Represented By: Christopher Benoit
Represented By: Lynn A. Coyle
Represented By: Enrique Moreno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pedro Ramirez
Represented By: Christopher Benoit
Represented By: Lynn A. Coyle
Represented By: Enrique Moreno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?