Shaw v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
CPT Tommie Shaw |
Diversified Consultants, Inc. |
3:2018cv00257 |
September 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Philip R Martinez |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Certified Mail Return Receipt of #9 Order Dismissing Case, (dt) |
Filing 10 Certified & Regular Mail Receipt of #9 Order Dismissing Case, (dt) |
Filing 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all settings in this matter areVACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions, if any, areDENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall CLOSEthis matter.. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (dt) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Diversified Consultants, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of dismissal with prejudice)(Penot, Charles) |
Filing 7 Certified & Regular Mail Receipt of #3 Order, #5 Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order, #4 Order (dt) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Charles R. Penot, Jr on behalf of Diversified Consultants, Inc. (Penot, Charles) |
Filing 5 Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order and Case Management Report. Plaintiff and Defendant shall submit a scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order and Case Management Report due by 10/10/2018,. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (dt) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO RETAIN LOCAL COUNSEL. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Diversified Consultants, Inc. RETAIN local counsel as soon as possible, but in no event later than October 10, 2018.. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (dt) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER TO REPLEAD IN REMOVED CASES. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (dt) |
Case assigned to Judge Philip R. Martinez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mm1) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Leon Schydlower (mm1) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Diversified Consultants, Inc.. (Penot, Charles) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Diversified Consultants, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-11192645), filed by Diversified Consultants, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Penot, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shaw v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Charles R. Penot, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CPT Tommie Shaw | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.