Daniel v. David et al
| Christopher Daniel |
| Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Warden Gregory S. David |
| 3:2019cv00068 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Frank Montalvo |
| Leon Schydlower |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Certified Mail Receipt of #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #6 Judgment (jg1) |
| Filing 7 Certified Mailing of #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #6 Judgment (jg1) |
| Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Frank Montalvo. (jg1) |
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Judge Frank Montalvo. (jg1)
|
| Filing 4 Certified Mail Receipt of #2 Report and Recommendations (jg1) |
| Filing 3 Certified Mailing of #2 Report and Recommendations (jg1) |
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this lawsuit be TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division. Signed by Judge Leon Schydlower. (LS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Daniel. (Attachments: #1 Financial Supplement, #2 Complaint 42 USC 1983, #3 Exhibit). Motions referred to Judge Leon Schydlower. (mn) |
| Pursuant to the Standing Order this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Schydlower (mn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
