Acheleke v. Vasquez
Petitioner: Miriam Asong Acheleke
Respondent: Gabriel Vasquez
Case Number: 3:2019cv00178
Filed: July 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Philip R Martinez
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2019 Filing 12 Certified Mail Return Receipt of #10 Order, #9 Order on Motion to Dismiss (dt)
July 19, 2019 Filing 11 Certified & Regular Mail Receipt of #10 Order, #9 Order on Motion to Dismiss (dt)
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FINAL JUDGMENT. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned cause isDISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all settings in this matter areVACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions in this cause,if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall CLOSE this case.. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (dt)
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions in this cause, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. FINALLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (dt)
July 12, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Gabriel Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit A)(Saenz, Angelica)
July 11, 2019 Filing 5 Certified Mail Return Receipt of #2 Order,, (dt)
July 8, 2019 Filing 4 Certified & Regular Mail Receipt of #2 Order,, (dt)
July 5, 2019 Filing 3 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Gabriel Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Saenz, Angelica)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO FILE A RESPONSE. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent Gabriel Vasquez FILE a response to the petition by no later than August 16, 2019. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Miriam AsongAcheleke may file a reply, provided that it is filed no later than eleven days after the date of service of Respondent Gabriel Vasquez's responsive pleading. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Respondent Gabriel Vasquez, and his agents, or anyone else acting on behalf, shall notify the Court before taking any action to transfer Petitioner Miriam Asong Acheleke outside of the Western District of Texas.. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (dt)
July 1, 2019 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 USC 2241 ( Filing fee $ 5; receipt number 300034379), filed by Miriam Asong Acheleke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Table of Contents, #8 Receipt)(mn)
July 1, 2019 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Berton (mn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acheleke v. Vasquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Miriam Asong Acheleke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gabriel Vasquez
Represented By: Magdalena G. Jara
Represented By: Angelica Astrid Saenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?