GESPA Nicaragua, S.A. v. Inabata Europe GmbH et al
| GESPA Nicaragua, S.A. |
| Flextronics Automotive USA (Texas), LLC, MKG GmbH Montagebau Karl Globel, Flextronics International USA, Inc., Inabata Europe GmbH and Recom AG |
| 3:2019cv00182 |
| July 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Philip R Martinez |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Recom AG Initial Disclosures (Castillo, Priscilla) |
| Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT Subject to Motion Remand Dkt 12 against All Plaintiffs amending, filed by GESPA Nicaragua, S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Recom Black Panther, #2 Exhibit 2, Counterfeit Recom Label, #3 Exhibit 3, Hidden SunEdison Label, #4 Exhibit 4, SunEdison Shipping Boxes (Concealed Labels), #5 Exhibit 5, Flex Auto BOL, #6 Exhibit 6, Flex International BOL, #7 Exhibit 7, Emails, #8 Exhibit 8, Commission and Setoff Agreement, #9 Exhibit 9, SunEdison Manual, #10 Exhibit 10, Miller Brothers Opinion and Order, #11 Exhibit 11, Emails in furtherance of Fraud, #12 Exhibit 12, Recom black listed by TUV, #13 Exhibit 13, Hansel BOL, #14 Exhibit 14, International News Article, #15 Exhibit 15, Recom Website, #16 Exhibit 16, Flash-Test Report (Excerpt))(Sisam, Joshua) |
| Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by GESPA Nicaragua, S.A., re #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff GESPA Nicaragua, S.A. (Sisam, Joshua) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Inabata Europe GmbH, re #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff GESPA Nicaragua, S.A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Prior Order, #2 Exhibit Prior Judgment, #3 Exhibit Prior Complaint, #4 Exhibit Fifth Circuit Order, #5 Exhibit Ashby Declaration, #6 Proposed Order)(Chapa, Justin) |
Filing 19
ORDER re #18 Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order filed by GESPA Nicaragua, S.A.. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (dt)
|
| Filing 18 Proposed Scheduling Order and Stipulation in Support there of by GESPA Nicaragua, S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation reguarding Scheduling Order)(Sisam, Joshua) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE Joint Status report by GESPA Nicaragua, S.A. re #6 Order, #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court (Sisam, Joshua) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Valerie Renee Auger on behalf of Flextronics Automotive USA (Texas), LLC, Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Auger, Valerie) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Francisco Javier Ortega on behalf of Inabata Europe GmbH. Attorney Francisco Javier Ortega added to party Inabata Europe GmbH(pty:dft) (Ortega, Francisco) |
| Filing 14 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by GESPA Nicaragua, S.A.. (Sisam, Joshua) |
| Filing 13 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by MKG GmbH Montagebau Karl Globel. (Mirazo, David) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Remand to State Court by GESPA Nicaragua, S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Table of Authorities, #2 Affidavit in Support of Remand, #3 Proposed Order)(Sisam, Joshua) |
| Filing 11 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Flextronics Automotive USA (Texas), LLC, Flextronics International USA, Inc.. (Huston, Peter) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter K. Huston on behalf of Flextronics Automotive USA (Texas), LLC, Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Huston, Peter) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Steven C. James on behalf of GESPA Nicaragua, S.A.. Attorney Steven C. James added to party GESPA Nicaragua, S.A.(pty:pla) (James, Steven) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John W. Petrelli, III on behalf of Inabata Europe GmbH. Attorney John W. Petrelli, III added to party Inabata Europe GmbH(pty:dft) (Petrelli, John) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO RETAIN LOCAL COUNSEL. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff GESPA Nicaragua, S.A. and Defendant Inabata Europe, GmbH RETAIN local counsel as soon as possible, but in no event later than August 12, 2019. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (mg2)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER AND CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall, separate and apart from the Proposed Scheduling Order, JOINTLY FILE the CASE MANAGEMENT REPORTas outlined in this Orderby no later than August 12, 2019. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (mg2)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER TO REPLEAD IN REMOVED CASES. Signed by Judge Philip R. Martinez. (mg2)
|
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to JS 44 Civil Cover Sheet by Inabata Europe GmbH. (Chapa, Justin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justin Roel Chapa on behalf of Inabata Europe GmbH (Chapa, Justin) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Inabata Europe GmbH. (Chapa, Justin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Inabata Europe GmbH (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12316093), filed by Inabata Europe GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Petition, #3 Exhibit German Translated Petition, #4 Exhibit Citation and Hague Service Documents, #5 Exhibit State Court Filings, #6 Exhibit Flextronics Consent to Removal)(Chapa, Justin) |
| Case assigned to Judge Philip R. Martinez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mn) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Torres (mn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
