St. Pierre v. City of El Paso, Texas et al
| Vanessa St. Pierre |
| Dearborn National Life Insurance Company and City of El Paso, Texas |
| 3:2019cv00223 |
| August 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David C Guaderrama |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE Withdrawing Motion to Remand by Vanessa St. Pierre re #3 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Supporting Memorandum (Milligan, Mike) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Supporting Memorandum by Vanessa St. Pierre. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Milligan, Mike) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Vanessa St. Pierre. (Milligan, Mike) |
| Case assigned to Judge David C Guaderrama. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (jg1) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Castaneda (jg1) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dearborn National Life Insurance Company, City of El Paso, Texas (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12476874), filed by Dearborn National Life Insurance Company, City of El Paso, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement)(MacRae, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
