Diocesan Migrant & Refugee Services, Inc. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
| Diocesan Migrant & Refugee Services, Inc. |
| U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| 3:2019cv00236 |
| August 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Frank Montalvo |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order due to the Court within sixty (60) days after the appearance of any defendant. Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order due by 10/30/2019,. Signed by Judge Frank Montalvo. (jg1)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Manuel Romero added to party United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement(pty:dft) by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.(Romero, Manuel) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diocesan Migrant & Refugee Services, Inc.. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement served on 8/26/2019, answer due 10/25/2019. (Coyle, Lynn) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (mn) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Schydlower (mn) |
| Case assigned to Judge Frank Montalvo. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mn) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Diocesan Migrant & Refugee Services, Inc.. (Coyle, Lynn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-12516092). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Diocesan Migrant & Refugee Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coyle, Lynn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Diocesan Migrant & Refugee Services, Inc. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement | |
| Represented By: | Manuel Romero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diocesan Migrant & Refugee Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lynn A. Coyle |
| Represented By: | Christopher Benoit |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
