Vargas v. Gap, Inc.
| Gabriela Vargas |
| Gap, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00243 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Frank Montalvo |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Support, filed by Gap, Inc., re #6 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Partial Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Gap, Inc. (Johnson, Ethel) |
| Filing 8 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Gabriela Vargas, re #6 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Partial Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Gap, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Chavez, Enrique) |
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT #4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Frank Montalvo. (scf)
|
| Filing 6 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Partial Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Gap, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Johnson, Ethel) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Gap, Inc. amending, filed by Gabriela Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F)(Chavez, Enrique) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER RULE 12(B)(6) OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT UNDER RULE 12(E) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE by Gap, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Johnson, Ethel) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal Supplement to JS 44 Civil Cover Sheet by Gap, Inc.. (Johnson, Ethel) |
| Notice of Correction: re #2 Pro Hac Vice Letter. PLEASE DISREGARD LETTER, ATTORNEY JOHN BRAMBLE IS ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN WDTX. (scf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Hac Vice Letter to John P. Bramble (scf) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Gap, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-12547624), filed by Gap, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Ethel) |
| Case assigned to Judge Frank Montalvo. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (scf) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Castaneda (scf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vargas v. Gap, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gabriela Vargas | |
| Represented By: | Michael Robert Anderson |
| Represented By: | Enrique Chavez, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gap, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Ethel J. Johnson |
| Represented By: | John Bramble |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
