Ramirez v. Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
| Orlando Ramirez |
| Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00004 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Kathleen Cardone |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Jury Selection / Jury Trial set for 2/26/2021 08:30 AM before Judge Kathleen Cardone, Status Conference set for 2/18/2021 02:00 PM before Judge Kathleen Cardone, (mn) |
Filing 6
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER, ( Jury Selection/Jury Trial set for 2/26/2021 08:30 AM before Judge Kathleen Cardone,, Status Conference set for 2/18/2021 02:00 PM before Judge Kathleen Cardone,). Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (mn) Modified on 2/27/2020 (mn).
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: ADR Report Deadline due by 10/1/2020, Plaintiff's Amended Pleadings due by 5/1/2020, Defendant's Amended Pleadings due by 5/15/2020, Discovery due by 8/31/2020, Plaintiff's Joinder of Parties due by 4/3/2020, Defendant's Joinder of Parties due by 4/3/2020, Motions due by 10/1/2020,. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (mn)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Report of Parties' Planning Meeting by Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (Sanchez, Gilbert) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to #2 Amended Complaint by Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc..(Sanchez, Gilbert) |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc. amending, filed by Orlando Ramirez.(Duke, Brett) |
| Case assigned to Judge Kathleen Cardone. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mn) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Torres (mn) |
| Remark : All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders of Judge Kathleen Cardone located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/index.html (mn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-13038935), filed by Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental)(Sanchez, Gilbert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramirez v. Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gilbert Luis Sanchez |
| Represented By: | Charles C. High, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Orlando Ramirez | |
| Represented By: | Daniela Labinoti |
| Represented By: | Brett Allen Duke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
