Campos v. GECU et al
| Crucita Campos |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC and GECU |
| 3:2020cv00027 |
| January 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David C Guaderrama |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to GECU. (mn) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. (mn) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Crucita Campos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Summons)(Bellinder, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0542-13144323), filed by Crucita Campos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - CSL, #2 Exhibit - POP, #3 Exhibit - July 19 CR, #4 Exhibit - Dispute, #5 Exhibit - Nov 19 CR, #6 Civil Cover Sheet - CCS)(Bellinder, Thomas) |
| Remark : All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders of Judge David C. Guaderrama located at https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/judges-information/standing-orders/index.html (mn) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Berton (mn) |
| Case assigned to Judge David C Guaderrama. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
