Ayika v. United States of America
| Peter Victor Ayika |
| United States of America |
| 3:2020cv00124 |
| May 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David Briones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Peter Victor Ayika. Per 5th Circuit rules, the appellant has 14 days, from the filing of the Notice of Appeal, to order the transcript. To order a transcript, the appellant should fill out a #(Transcript Order) and follow the instructions set out on the form. This form is available in the Clerk's Office or by clicking the hyperlink above. (lc3) |
| Filing 14 Certified Mail Receipt of #12 Memorandum Opinion and Order (lc3) |
| Filing 13 Certified Mailing of #12 Memorandum Opinion and Order (lc3) |
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Denied Certificate of Appealability.. Signed by Judge David Briones. (lc3)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE DOCKET WITH AFFIDAVIT by Peter Victor Ayika. (lc3) Modified on 6/16/2020 (lc3). |
| Filing 10 Filing fee received in the amount of $100, receipt number 300036407 (lc3) |
| Filing 9 Filing fee received in the amount of $505, receipt number 300036408 (lc3) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Peter Victor Ayika.(lc3) |
| Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipt of #2 Memorandum Opinion and Order, #3 Judgment (lc3) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE No Payment Send by Peter Victor Ayika (lc3) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Peter Victor Ayika. Per 5th Circuit rules, the appellant has 14 days, from the filing of the Notice of Appeal, to order the transcript. To order a transcript, the appellant should fill out a #(Transcript Order) and follow the instructions set out on the form. This form is available in the Clerk's Office or by clicking the hyperlink above. (lc3) |
| Filing 4 Certified Mailing of #2 Memorandum Opinion and Order, #3 Judgment (lc3) |
| Filing 3 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge David Briones. (lc3) |
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER'S PETITION AND IMPOSING SANCTIONS. Dismissed without prejudice. Denied Certificate of Appealability Signed by Judge David Briones. (lc3)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Peter Victor Ayika.(jg1) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Castaneda (jg1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ayika v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Magdalena G. Jara |
| Represented By: | Joseph H. Gay, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Peter Victor Ayika | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
