Leedsman Construction, Inc.v. Sundt Construction, Inc. et al
| Leedsman Construction, Inc. d/b/a Traffic Control Specialist |
| Sundt Construction, Inc. and Zurich-American Insurance Company |
| 3:2020cv00153 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Miguel A Torres |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Pro Hac Vice Letter. (jg1) |
| Filing 5 Pro Hac Vice Letter. (jg1) |
| Filing 4 Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Consent to Trial by Magistrate due by 7/1/2020,. Signed by Judge Miguel A. Torres. (jg1) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Zurich-American Insurance Company. (Voge, Jamey) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Sundt Construction, Inc.. (Voge, Jamey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Sundt Construction, Inc., Zurich-American Insurance Company (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-13616966), filed by Sundt Construction, Inc., Zurich-American Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement)(Voge, Jamey) |
| Case assigned to Judge Miguel A. Torres. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (jg1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
