Watkins v. AT&T Corp.
| Debra Watkins |
| AT&T Corp. |
| 3:2020cv00273 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David C Guaderrama |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STATUS REPORT by AT&T Corp.. (Hernandez, Stacey) |
Filing 13
OMNIBUS ORDER VACATINGMARCH 2021 DOCKET CALLS IN CIVIL CASES. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
|
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Pretrial Conference set for 12/16/2021 02:00 PM before Judge David C Guaderrama, Jury Selection set for 12/27/2021 09:00AM before Judge David C Guaderrama, Jury Trial set for 12/27/2021 09:00 AM before Judge David C Guaderrama, Amended Pleadings due by 3/21/2021, Discovery due by 7/19/2021, Joinder of Parties due by 3/21/2021, Dispositive Motions due by 9/17/2021,. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #9 Joint Motion for Entry of Protective Order Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
|
| Filing 10 Proposed Scheduling Order by AT&T Corp.. (Hernandez, Stacey) |
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by AT&T Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Exhibit A Proposed Protective Order)(Hernandez, Stacey) |
| Filing 8 ADR Report Filed - by AT&T Corp.(Hernandez, Stacey) |
| Filing 7 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan by AT&T Corp.. (Hernandez, Stacey) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #3 Amended Complaint by AT&T Corp..(Hernandez, Stacey) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO FILE A PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER AND A JOINT REPORT due to the Court by 12/28/2020. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (em)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #2 Order by Debra Watkins. (Chavez, Enrique) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against AT&T Corp. amending, filed by Debra Watkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Chavez, Enrique) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REGARDING VENUE. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mc4)
|
| Case assigned to Judge David C Guaderrama. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (jg1) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Schydlower (jg1) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AT&T Corp. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0542-14138535), filed by AT&T Corp..(Hernandez, Stacey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Watkins v. AT&T Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AT&T Corp. | |
| Represented By: | Stacey Cho Hernandez |
| Represented By: | Ruben Gandia |
| Represented By: | Courtney Barksdale Perez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Debra Watkins | |
| Represented By: | Enrique Chavez, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
