Zayo Group, LLC v. Megacable Holdings S.A.B. de C.V. et al
Plaintiff: Zayo Group, LLC
Defendant: Megacable Holdings S.A.B. de C.V. d/b/a Megacable Comunicaciones and Telefonia por Cable, S.A. de C.V.
Case Number: 3:2021cv00072
Filed: March 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Kathleen Cardone
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER establishing that based on ECF No. 8, Zayo has established the presence of diversity jurisdiction in this case. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (mn)
April 8, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE Identifying Citizenship by Zayo Group, LLC re #5 Order, (Hand-Bender, Tess)
April 5, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER by Zayo Group, LLC re #6 Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Hand-Bender, Tess)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING IN PART #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (mn)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that ORDERS Plaintiff FILE a written notice identifying each ofthe members of Zayo Group, LLC, and their citizenship on or before April 12, 2021, to facilitate the Courts determination of whether subject matter jurisdiction lies in this matter Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (mn)
March 23, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Megacable Holdings S.A.B. de C.V., Telefonia por Cable, S.A. de C.V.. (dt)
March 22, 2021 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Schydlower (dt)
March 22, 2021 Case assigned to Judge Kathleen Cardone. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dt)
March 22, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Kathleen Charles Pritchard for Tess Hand-Bender ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14616368) by on behalf of Zayo Group, LLC. (Pritchard, Kathleen)
March 22, 2021 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Zayo Group, LLC. (Pritchard, Kathleen)
March 22, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14616295), filed by Zayo Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pritchard, Kathleen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zayo Group, LLC v. Megacable Holdings S.A.B. de C.V. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zayo Group, LLC
Represented By: Kathleen Charles Pritchard
Represented By: Tess Hand-Bender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Megacable Holdings S.A.B. de C.V. d/b/a Megacable Comunicaciones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Telefonia por Cable, S.A. de C.V.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?