Gomez v. The Attorney General of the State of Texas
Victor Gomez |
The Attorney General of the State of Texas |
3:2021cv00146 |
June 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
David C Guaderrama |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Return signed Certified Mail Receipt to Victor Gomez of #9 Final Judgment, and #8 Memorandum Opinion and Order, (mc4) |
Filing 11 Certified Mailing of #9 Judgment,, #8 Memorandum Opinion and Order, (em) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Victor Gomez (em) |
Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner Victor Gomez's pro se "Petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody" (ECF No. 1) is DENIED, and his civil cause is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Victor Gomez is DENIED a certificate ofappealability. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED.IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the District Clerk shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (em) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Victor Gomez; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Gomez is DENIED a certificate of appealability. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the District Clerk shall CLOSE this case.. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (em) |
Filing 7 Filing fee received in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 300038030 (mg2) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Victor Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence)(mg2) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/19/2021: #2 Attachment) (mg2). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/19/2021: #3 IFP Data) (mg2). |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to #2 Order to Show Cause, by Victor Gomez. (mg2) |
Filing 4 Certified RETURN/RECD Mail Receipt of #2 Order to Show Cause, (mg2) |
Filing 3 Certified Mail Receipt of #2 Order to Show Cause and a Blank IFP application. (mg2) |
Filing 2 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. IT IS ORDERED that Gomez shall, within twenty-one days of the entry of this order, either (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee or (2) complete and return the form application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge David C Guaderrama. (mg2) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28:2254, (NO FILING FEE SUBMITTED AND NO APPLICAITON FOR IFP SUBMITTED), filed by Victor Gomez.(mt) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Schydlower (mt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gomez v. The Attorney General of the State of Texas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Victor Gomez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of Texas | |
Represented By: | Edward L. Marshall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.