Cordero v. Union Pacific Railroad
Bernardo Cordero |
Union Pacific Railroad, individually, and as successor-in-interest to Southern Transportation Company and Union Pacific Railroad |
3:2021cv00176 |
August 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Kathleen Cardone |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses. Attorney Gregory S. Hudson added to party Union Pacific Railroad(pty:dft) by Union Pacific Railroad.(Hudson, Gregory) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Union Pacific Railroad amending, filed by Bernardo Cordero.(Vickery, Earl) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bernardo Cordero. Union Pacific Railroad served on 8/16/2021, answer due 9/7/2021. (Vickery, Earl) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Union Pacific Railroad. (ep1) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Schydlower (ep1) |
Case assigned to Judge Kathleen Cardone. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (ep1) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Bernardo Cordero. (Vickery, Earl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15081651), filed by Bernardo Cordero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vickery, Earl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.