Rodriguez v. The Little Shack, Inc. et al
| Rodolfo Rodriguez |
| The Little Shack, Inc. and Nelly Bordier |
| 3:2021cv00295 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Kathleen Cardone |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Defendant's Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses. Attorney Michael Blake Downey added to party Nelly Bordier(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Blake Downey added to party The Little Shack, Inc.(pty:dft) by Nelly Bordier, The Little Shack, Inc..(Downey, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nelly Bordier, The Little Shack, Inc.. (dt) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James M. Dore on behalf of Rodolfo Rodriguez (Dore, James) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Rodolfo Rodriguez. (Dore, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15494743), filed by Rodolfo Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dore, James) |
| Case assigned to Judge Kathleen Cardone and Judge Kathleen Cardone. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dt) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Schydlower (dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
