Quinones v. Armendariz et al
Erika Quinones |
Detective David Camacho, Detective John R Armendariz, David Camacho, John R Armendariz and James Montoya |
3:2022cv00021 |
January 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
David Briones |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against John R Armendariz, David Camacho amending, filed by Erika Quinones.(lc3) |
Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING #13 Motion for Leave to File Signed by Judge David Briones. (lc3) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File by Erika Quinones. (Attachments: #1 3rd Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Brown, Troy) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Erika Quinones, re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant David Camacho's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant David Camacho, #9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ECF No. 7 filed by Defendant John R Armendariz (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Order)(Brown, Troy) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File by Erika Quinones. (Attachments: #1 P's 3rd Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Brown, Troy) |
Filing 10 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan by John R Armendariz, David Camacho. (Almanzan, Andres) |
Filing 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint ECF No. 7 by John R Armendariz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Almanzan, Andres) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant David Camacho's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint by David Camacho. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brittain, Eric) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint against John R Armendariz, David Camacho amending, filed by Erika Quinones.(Brown, Troy) |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT Defendants John R. Armendariz's and David Camacho's Supplement Record to Joint Notice of Removal by John R Armendariz, David Camacho. (Brittain, Eric) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant David Camacho's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss by David Camacho. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brittain, Eric) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss (FRCP 12(b)(6) Plaintiff's First Amended Petition by John R Armendariz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Almanzan, Andres) |
Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all motions pending before the state court, if there are any, are DENIED unless refiled in this Court. Signed by Judge David Briones. (mg2) |
Filing 2 ORDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26 AND LOCAL COURT RULE CV-16. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ALL PARTIES TIMELY COMPLY with the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 and Local Court Rule CV-16. Signed by Judge David Briones. (mg2) |
Case assigned to Judge David Briones. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lc3) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge CASTANEDA (lc3) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by John R Armendariz, David Camacho Defendants John R. Armendariz's and David Camacho's Joint Notice of Removal (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15599643), filed by John R Armendariz, David Camacho. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet JS 44, #2 Supplement Supplement to JS 44 Cover Sheet)(Brittain, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.