MURILLO v. SUNLAND PARK MALL, LLC et al
| EVELIA FERNANDEZ MURILLO |
| SUNLAND PARK MALL, LLC and Schindler Elevator Corporation |
| 3:2022cv00085 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David C Guaderrama |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Entered by Judge David C Guaderrama. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (phlc)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney JonCarlo Serna by Michael Kirk Mathis Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16016708) by on behalf of EVELIA FERNANDEZ MURILLO. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mathis, Michael) Modified on 5/10/2022 (mc4). |
| Filing 9 Letter/Correspondence to attorney C.Ornelas. (mg2) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT Plaintiff's Original Complaint, filed by EVELIA FERNANDEZ MURILLO. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Mathis, Michael) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Kirk Mathis on behalf of EVELIA FERNANDEZ MURILLO. Attorney Michael Kirk Mathis added to party EVELIA FERNANDEZ MURILLO(pty:pla) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Mathis, Michael) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Entered by Judge David C Guaderrama. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (phlc)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by T. Christopher Trent ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15820683) by on behalf of SUNLAND PARK MALL, LLC, Schindler Elevator Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order on Pro Hac Vice)(Trent, T.) |
| Filing 5 Pro Hac Vice Letter to David J. Dennenberg, JOHNSON, TRENT & TAYLOR, L.L.P. (mg2) . |
| Filing 4 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Eduardo D. Kosturakis, CESAR ORNELAS LAW, PLLC. (mg2) |
| Case assigned to Judge David C Guaderrama. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mg2) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge SCHYDLOWER (mg2) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by SUNLAND PARK MALL, LLC. (Trent, T.) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation. (Trent, T.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Schindler Elevator Corporation, SUNLAND PARK MALL, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15813779), filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation, SUNLAND PARK MALL, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Exhibit 6; Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Supplement Exhibit 7; Supplement to Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8; Index, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 9; Counsel of Record)(Trent, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
