Luevano v. Twin City Crane and Hoist, Inc. et al
| Carol Mario luevano and Mario Luevano |
| Twin City Crane and Hoist, Inc., BC Industrial Supply Corp d/b/a BC Wire Rope & Rigging, Columbus McKinnon Corporation a/k/a Coffing Hoists, BC Industrial Supply Corp d/b/a BC Wire Rope and Rigging and Columbus McKinnon Corporation |
| 3:2022cv00136 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Kathleen Cardone |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER, ( Jury Selection set for 5/26/2023 08:30AM before Judge Kathleen Cardone,, Jury Trial set for 5/26/2023 08:30 AM before Judge Kathleen Cardone,, Status Conference set for 5/18/2023 02:00 PM before Judge Kathleen Cardone,). Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (dt)
|
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: ADR Mediation Completed by 1/16/2023, Amended Pleadings due by 9/17/2022, Discovery due by 12/15/2022, Joinder of Parties due by 8/13/2022, Motions due by 1/16/2023,. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (dt)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Joint Report of Parties' Planning Meeting by Twin City Crane and Hoist, Inc. (Bonner, Richard) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER for the parties to submit a joint report of parties planning meeting no later than June 14, 2022. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (dc)
|
| Filing 7 Certified Mail Delivered Receipt of Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (dt) |
| Filing 6 Certified Mailing of Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice,,, (dt) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS ORDERED that Tomas Porras-Acosta may appear on behalf of Columbus McKinnon Corporation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney Tomas Porras-Acosta, if he has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00 made payable to the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Entered by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (KC)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Henry J. Paoli for Tomas Porras-Acosta ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16006513) by on behalf of Columbus McKinnon Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Paoli, Henry) |
| Filing 4 Certified Mail Returned Receipt of #2 Pro Hac Vice Letter (dt) |
| Filing 3 Certified Mailing of #2 Pro Hac Vice Letter (dt) |
| Filing 2 Pro Hac Vice Letter as to Tomas Porras-Acosta (dt) |
| Case assigned to Judge Kathleen Cardone. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (dt) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Castaneda (dt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Columbus McKinnon Corporation a/k/a Coffing Hoists (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15952732), filed by Columbus McKinnon Corporation a/k/a Coffing Hoists. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS-44, #2 Supplement JS-44)(Paoli, Henry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
