Sorrel v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
| Laura Sorrel |
| United of Omaha Life Insurance Company |
| 3:2022cv00449 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Frank Montalvo |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: Consent to Trial by Magistrate due by 2/16/2023, Jury Selection set for 10/30/2023 01:00PM before Judge Frank Montalvo, Jury Trial set for 10/30/2023 01:00 PM before Judge Frank Montalvo, ADR Report Deadline due by 6/30/2023, Amended Pleadings due by 3/2/2023, Discovery due by 6/16/2023, Motions due by 7/31/2023,. Signed by Judge Frank Montalvo. (jg1)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Joint Submission of Proposed Scheduling Order by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brien, Andrew) |
|
Filing 4
Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order due to the Court within sixty (60) days after the appearance of any defendant. Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order due by 1/13/2023,. Signed by Judge Frank Montalvo. (jg1)
|
| Filing 3 Defendant United of Omaha Life Insurance Company's ANSWER to Complaint , Affirmative Defenses and, COUNTERCLAIM against Laura Sorrel by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Richardson, Jason) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Berton (jg1) |
| Case assigned to Judge Frank Montalvo. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (jg1) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company for United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. (Richardson, Jason) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number ATXWDC-16814158), filed by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Supplement Civil Cover Sheet)(Richardson, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sorrel v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Laura Sorrel | |
| Represented By: | Leonel Nunez, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United of Omaha Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Jason A. Richardson |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Brien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
