Eppler et al v. United States of America
| Ysabel Eppler and Thomas Eppler |
| United States of America |
| 3:2023cv00037 |
| January 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| David C Guaderrama |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States of America, c/o Attorney General and USAO, Civil Process Clerk. (em) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Thomas Eppler, Ysabel Eppler. (Boyaki, Walter) |
| Filing 2 JS44 (Civil Cover Sheet) submitted by Thomas Eppler, Ysabel Eppler. (Boyaki, Walter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Plaintiffs' Original Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17003747). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Ysabel Eppler, Thomas Eppler.(Boyaki, Walter) |
| All parties shall comply with the Standing Orders of Judge David C. Guaderrama located at http://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/Rules/StandingOrders/default.asp#elpaso. (em) |
| Case assigned to Judge David C Guaderrama. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (em) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Torres (em) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
